seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, It's also a very well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” will not be binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance into the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.

R.O, Office, Gujranwala along with the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade on the accused hasn't been conducted however. In the instant case, now the accused tried to take advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture in the petitioner was extensively circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity from the accused through electronic media. The legislation lends assurance to your accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly for that witness to establish the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer set a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and made images. Besides, the images shown about the media expose that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to hide his identity until he was place up for an identification parade. Making photos of the accused publically, possibly by showing the same to the witness or by publicizing the same in any newspaper or plan, would create doubt while in the proceedings of your identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to guarantee that there is not any chance with the witness to begin to see the accused before going for the identification parade. The accused should not be shown for the witness in person or through any click here other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or maybe the push or electronic media. Specified the reasons elaborated over, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is additionally a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.

 Petitioner possessing been declared an absconder in this case for over just one in addition to a fifty percent year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may perhaps avoid standing trial and therefore delay the prosecution with the case. The material on record makes the case on the petitioner falls under two exceptions to your rule of grant of bail as mentioned higher than.

There are innumerable instances where death was never intended – even more where These nominated inside the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of a human being is often a tragic event. Though the death of any dwelling being is not any much less a tragic event.

department concerned shall present the complete list of ACRs of your concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)

The regulation of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called law of necessity..

Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and steadiness. It demonstrates the commitment in the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of law.

Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to your person, by carrying out an act which during the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently perilous that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death on the these kinds of person, is alleged to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”

Здесь представлены рекомендации и описания способов лечения данным заболеванием.

To acquire notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia as well as the Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become readily available, please enter your contact information beneath.